Normally when the calendar turns over to January I write a post about New Year's food resolutions. I think all of us have enough pressure on us this year without adding to it, so I skipped the resolution post. However, some of you might have made one anyway, like the The New York Times' Genevieve Ko did. Her resolution is about making a recipe exactly as written.

Ko feels that too often she places her own preferences and kitchen experience ahead of the recipe author's, which she believe might be keeping her from truly experiencing a dish. Instead, she aims to play it straight in 2021 so that she can "get to know their creators without altering the dishes to match my own experiences or tastes." Ko says that to "truly embrace another person’s background and culture, I need to suspend my own assumptions, culinary and otherwise."
This resolution does not mean that Ko will blindly follow just any recipe she finds on the internet. She provides suggestions on what she will look for in a recipe so she has confidence that it will be successful. First, she will consider only recipes that are written with specific ingredients lists and instructions - some recipes are loosely framed and for those you must insert your own judgment. Ko will also be on the hunt for recipes that are outside her comfort zone or that sound "surprising in some way" so that she will be less tempted to deviate from the instructions. Finally, she will only use recipes that have been tested in some way. The best way to do that is to look for recipes from authors or websites that inform you that their recipes are tested prior to publication. Most of the recipes you'll find in the EYB library from well-known authors have been put to the test, so that makes it easy.
Ko believes that allowing the recipe writer's voice to shine through can lead to culinary discovery that she wouldn't reach if she were to substitute her own ideas for that of the author. Although it is often difficult for me to follow a recipe exactly - for example, I almost always add more garlic than indicated - I believe Ko make a good case for hewing more closely to the original, and I'll give it a shot (although I won't call it a resolution). Maybe I will make some discoveries along the way as well.
CookShelf
10 comments
averythingcooks
Rinshin
Jenny
chriscooks
tmjellicoe
MarciK
eliza
Vanessa
Preference for more garlic, or no cilantro, or the ingredients that you have, can easily source, or can easily afford, isn't "unconscious bias". It is the conscious application of experience, simple practicality, and even a bit of artistic decision-making.
Precisely following a recipe (which has OF COURSE been written for a specific audience) might be useful to teach you some new techniques. Trying recipes outside your comfort zone -- also useful. But trumpeting this as your newly found "embrace" of another culture is drawing an unwarranted conclusion. (And laughably, this especially so when her examples are as insignificant as a lower temp on a braise or timing on adding curry powder, and don't get me started on how "Madras curry powder" is going to let us participate authentically in "Burmese culture".)
My conclusion is that this article is actually tongue-in-cheek and intended satirically!
gamulholland
GenieB
I usually write on the recipe (if I own the book) what changes I want to do the next time — add more of something, add something new, reduce something.